osullivan8E is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
- Find a debate you care about.
- Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
- Earn points and become a thought leader!
To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.
Be Yourself
Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
PedroS17
| Reward Points: | 0 |
| Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 75% |
| Arguments: | 2 |
| Debates: | 0 |
Joined:
Argument 2: An example is when a vice principal in New Jersey school searched through a female student’s purse and locker for suspicious items in 1985. Although he found those suspicious items, he still committed a crime, the vice principal broke the morals of the 4th Amendment by invading the student’s privacy. It violated the student’s privacy and morality, and also teachers are not even close to be an authority, and even authorities need to have warrant before search anything from anybody.
This is a violation of the students privacy for example a school in Quebec is under fire for strip searching students “So they ordered each of the 10th-graders into a back room and told them to remove some of their clothes.”-Daily News. Imagine how the 10th graders feel being stripped and searched. This could make the student feel uncomfortable and violate. School officials should never order students to take off any of their private items with themselves.
About Me
|
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |
Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here
