osullivan8E

However not everything is about TSA scanners this case right here about they talk about how the FBI wanted to unlock the persons phone but Apple said no and that they made a commitment not to unlock peoples phone without their consent. The 4th amendment is more than just searching people.

http://www.wctrib.com/news/region/4221338-minn-supreme-court-reverses-meeker-county-fourth-amendment-case

That was one of the first times there was a terrorists attack that big happened and people were caught off guard. Now there is no need to scan peoples body and invade them when their is a lot more security and awareness of what happened. Now they have a lot more security and checks on the pilot and things like metal detectors. Doing a full body scan on everyone even without suspicion is excessive.

Argument 2: Apple has agreed with their customers that it was unreasonable to unlock someones phone without their consent. The FBI had suspicion that someone was committing a crime and they found his phone but it had a password. They went to apple saying that they need to unlock it to see his information but Apple said no and that they have a commitment with their customers not to invade their privacy.

Argument 1: In the court case where they arrested this girl she had a case that the cops were violating the amendment and they shouldn’t be allowed to do that. Just because they had suspicion of her smuggling drugs it doesn't give them the right to barge into the boyfriends house and arrest her there. Because maybe the boyfriend didn't know so it gave them no right to go into his house and invade his house.

Opening Statement: The 4th amendment The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Although some people believe that they don’t need to always follow that amendment and they just go and can falsely accuse someone. Someone people think because they have a higher position they can force you to get someone information. There have been many cases where the police or government have broken this amendment not knowing that they could get in trouble for violating that law.