Return to CreateDebate.comosullivan8e • Join this debate community

osullivan8E



Welcome to osullivan8E!

osullivan8E is a social tool that democratizes the decision-making process through online debate. Join Now!
  • Find a debate you care about.
  • Read arguments and vote the best up and the worst down.
  • Earn points and become a thought leader!

To learn more, check out the FAQ or Tour.



Be Yourself

Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.

Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.


FB
Facebook addict? Check out our page and become a fan because you love us!


pic
Report This User
Permanent Delete

Allies
View All
None

Enemies
View All
None

Hostiles
View All
None

RSS Tamarat

Reward Points:2
Efficiency: Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive).

Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high.
58%
Arguments:2
Debates:0
meter
Efficiency Monitor
Online:


Joined:
2 most recent arguments.
0 points

Although it CAN be a violation of the students privacy, but only if there is no actual reason for the search. Teachers and School officials need the right reason to do so. Another thing to keep in mind is that Lockers are the school's property, not the student's. For strip searching, a student has the right to decline any kind of search.

Outside of schools, the Fourth Amendment generally means that the police must have “probable cause” to search a suspect. As Justice David Souter recently summarized, that means police may only conduct a search if there is “a fair possibility or a substantial chance” a search will turn up evidence of a crime.Inside of schools, the Fourth Amendment has been interpreted differently. Ever since the Supreme Court’s 1985 decision in New Jersey v. T.L.O., school officials may search a student’s outer clothing.

In the USA schools do not have the right to strip search students, and in Quebec, it's the same so clearly the school got in trouble for that And the incident was not reoccurring.

1 point

Argument 1:

Searches in schools maintains and ensures the safety of students.

Evidence: A report made by two students to a school official that another student possesses a gun at school constitutes reasonable suspicion to search the student and his locker (In re Commonwealth v. Carey, 1990). The school official has reasonable suspicion, and meaning behind his search of the student and his locker. This search prevented potential dangers, and problems to occur, because the student might’ve used the gun to harm the others in the environment. Another example is, ‘An anonymous phone call advising an administrator that a student will be bringing drugs to school, coupled with the student's reputation as a drug dealer, creates reasonable suspicion to search the student's pockets and book bag’ (State of New Hampshire v. Drake, 1995). This suspicion caused them to make an unlawful search, on the student, to make sure they didn’t carry any drugs. The search made was reasonable; the principal receiving a phone call informing him that one of the students will be bringing in drugs.

Tamarat has not yet created any debates.

About Me


I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know!


Want an easy way to create new debates about cool web pages? Click Here