osullivan8E

To conclude there should be way more restrictions on guns due to the reasons that we just stated. It would be safer and better for everyone, people should be able to go out into their driveways without having the fear that the would get shot. Which is why there should be more restrictions.

We are not saying that they should have it by the age of 12 we are saying that the deaths increase after the age of 12. Kids can find the guns from where the parents hid it and they can harm someone else or themselves.

Argument 3:

On average year more than 12,000 people are killed using firearms. Families might keep guns to keep them safe but if the child gets the hold of the gun what would happen.265 kid have been involved with firearms and where do they get the firearms from? Their parents. And if a child takes a hold of that gun, he can either accidentally hurt someone or purposely. For example an 8 year old child found a loaded rifle in his family shed and he took it outside during a game of cops and robbers, and fired it at another boy. While the kid did live no one wants that to happen to another kid or their own.

However with more restrictions there would be less murders and in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting Adam Lanza didn't get his gun illegally he got it from his mom who got it legally for self defense. Dylan Roof also got his gun legally yet he still used it to kill those people.

However she can use that gun a commit suicide due to her emotional state. That would show that there need to be checks on their mental health to ensure that they won't harm themselves or others.

People might be getting raped but if the victim shoots the offender to death there is also criminal responsibility. In self defense dangerous weapons are not the only solution.